医学分子生物学杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5): 502-513.doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1672-8009.2026.05.004

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

结直肠癌不同原发部位肠道微生物组的宏基因组学荟萃分析

廖之诚, 龙夏薇, 黎倩, 王宗佳, 林有智, 李永强, 廖小莉   

  1. 广西医科大学附属肿瘤医院消化肿瘤内科 南宁市, 530021
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-08 出版日期:2026-09-30 发布日期:2026-09-30
  • 通讯作者: 廖小莉(E-mail:nllxl@163.com)
  • 作者简介:#:共同第一作者
  • 基金资助:
    广西重点研发计划项目(No.桂科AB25069073),广西自然科学基金(No.2023GXNSFAA026156、No.2023GXNSFAA026145),国家自然科学基金地区基金(No.82060545)

Metagenomic Meta-Analysis of Gut Microbiome in Different Primary Locations of Colorectal Cancer

LIAO Zhicheng, LONG Xiawei, LI Qian, WANG Zongjia, LIN Youzhi, LI Yongqiang, LIAO Xiaoli   

  1. Department of First Chemotherapy, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, China
  • Received:2025-12-08 Online:2026-09-30 Published:2026-09-30
  • Contact: LIAO Xiaoli (E-mail:nllxl@163.com)
  • About author:#:These authors contributed equally as first author.
  • Supported by:
    Guangxi Key Research and Development Program(No. Gui Ke AB25069073), Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province(No. 2023GXNSFAA026156,No.2023GXNSFAA026145), Regional Fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China(No. 82060545)

摘要: 目的 肠道微生物与结直肠癌(colorectal cancer,CRC)的原发部位有关,为探讨结直肠癌不同原发部位肠道微生物组的差异特征,本研究整合宏基因组数据进行荟萃分析。方法 从3项研究中收集了宏基因组数据,根据右半结肠癌(right-sided colon cancer,RCC)、左半结肠癌(left-sided colon cancer,LCC)与直肠癌(rectal cancer,RC)这三个部位进行分组,首先通过双因素方差分析及菌群多样性比较识别混杂因素。随后构建微生物共现网络。采用随机森林算法构建原发肿瘤位置的预测模型。最后,将肿瘤位置与混杂因素纳入Maaslin2(microbiome multivariable associations with linear models)模型中,同时使用线性判别分析(linear discriminant analysis,LDA)以识别出差异性物种。结果 研究来源和 BMI是主要混杂因素。肠道微生物的α/β多样性在不同肿瘤部位无显著差异。放线菌门、厚壁菌门和变形菌门在三个微生物网络中均发挥关键链接作用,拟杆菌门在 RCC 的微生物网络中更为显著。三个网络中既存在共同的关键菌群,也有各自的特有关键菌群。随机森林分类模型在预测RC时表现良好,但在区分 RCC 和 LCC 时表现较差。通过对比CC与RC,以及对比RCC与LCC,Maaslin2和 LDA鉴定出的部分差异性菌群曾被报道与 CRC 位置相关的分子及免疫特征有关。结论 本研究阐明了肠道微生物组与 CRC 原发部位之间的关系,并证实 RCC、LCC 和 RC 在肠道微生物富集模式上存在差异。

关键词: 宏基因组学, 微生物组, 结直肠癌, 肿瘤位置, 荟萃分析

Abstract: Objective The intestinal microbiota is related to the primary site of colorectal cancer (CRC). To explore the differences in the intestinal microbiome among different primary sites of colorectal cancer, this study conducted a meta-analysis using comprehensive genomic data. Methods Genomic data were collected from three studies and grouped according to three sites: right-sided colon cancer (RCC), left-sided colon cancer (LCC), and rectal cancer (RC). Firstly, confounding factors were identified through two-factor variance analysis and comparison of microbial diversity. Subsequently, a microbial co-occurrence network was constructed. A random forest algorithm was used to build a prediction model for the location of the primary tumor. Finally, tumor location and confounding factors were incorporated into the Maaslin2 (microbiome multivariable associations with linear models) model and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was used to identify differentially expressed species. Results The sources of research and BMI are the main confounding factors. There is no significant difference in the α/β diversity of intestinal microbiota among different tumor sites. The Actinobacteria phylum, Firmicutes phylum, and Proteobacteria phylum all play key linking roles in the three microbial networks, and the Bacteroidetes phylum is more significant in the microbial network of RCC. There are both common key bacterial groups and their own unique key bacterial groups in the three networks. The random forest classification model performs well in predicting RC, but performs poorly in distinguishing RCC from LCC. By comparing CC with RC, and comparing RCC with LCC, some of the differential bacterial groups identified by Maaslin2 and LDA have been reported to be related to molecular and immune characteristics of CRC location. Conclusion This study elucidated the relationship between gut microbiome and CRC location and confirmed that RCC, LCC, and RC had different enrich patterns of microbiota.

Key words: metagenomic, microbiome, colorectal cancer, tumor location, meta-analysis

中图分类号: