华中科技大学学报(医学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (5): 680-689.doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1672-0741.26.03.027

• 实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

胸腰椎骨折内固定取出术后钉道对伤椎稳定性的影响分析*

陈炜城1,2, 游尉1,3, 杨起坤1,4, 姚葛亮1,3, 杜浏学1,3, 陈宣银1,3, 陈江伟1,3, 周荣平1,3, 刘志礼1,3,5, 刘家明1,3,5△   

  1. 1南昌大学第一附属医院骨科,南昌 330006;
    2南昌大学第一临床医学院,南昌 330100;
    3脊柱脊髓系统疾病江西省重点实验室,南昌 330006;
    4吉安市中心人民医院,吉安 343000;
    5南昌大学脊柱脊髓研究所,南昌 330006
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-15 发布日期:2026-10-30
  • 通讯作者: △E-mail:liujiamingdr@hotmail.com
  • 作者简介:陈炜城,男,2005年生,临床医学专业本科生,E-mail: 18016689667@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    *江西省重点研发计划项目(No. 20181ACG70012)

Analysis of the Impact of Screw Trajectory on Vertebral Stability After Internal Fixation Removal for Thoracolumbar Fractures

Chen Weicheng1,2, You Wei1,3, Yang Qikun1,4 et al   

  1. 1Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China;
    2The First Clinical Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330100, China;
    3Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Spine and Spinal Cord Diseases, Nanchang 330006, China;
    4Ji' an Central People' s Hospital, Ji' an 343000, China
  • Received:2026-03-15 Published:2026-10-30
  • Contact: △E-mail:liujiamingdr@hotmail.com

摘要: 目的 探讨胸腰椎骨折手术中椎弓根螺钉植入产生的骨性隧道对椎体抗载荷能力的影响,明确“隧道盾构”作用在胸腰椎骨折手术治疗中的生物力学效应。方法 选取10只3月龄巴马小型猪随机分为单侧置钉组(n=5)与双侧置钉组(n=5),行腰椎后路手术于L1~L5椎弓根植入直径2.5 mm螺钉(单侧组单边置钉,双侧组双边置钉)。术后分期获取脊柱标本,通过CT扫描量化钉道壁皮质化程度,建立L2椎体三维有限元模型,分析钉道应力分布。采用液压试验机对比置钉椎体与正常椎体的生物力学强度差异。纳入83例胸腰椎骨折行椎弓根螺钉取出术患者,根据伤椎置钉方式分为单侧置钉组、双侧置钉组、未置钉组。通过脊柱X线及CT扫描,于取内固定术前、术后即刻及末次随访时测量伤椎及其邻近椎体形态和钉道参数,分析不同置钉方式对脊柱稳定性和钉道的影响。结果 椎弓根螺钉植入小型猪椎体后,通过“盾构”作用使钉道壁发生皮质化。随着置钉时间的延长,钉道壁的皮质化越明显,椎体的最大承载应力逐渐增加,但仍低于正常椎体的最大承载应力。在钉道直径相同的情况下,随着钉道壁厚度的增加,单侧和双侧钉道模型皮质骨受力逐渐减小,松质骨受力逐渐增加,而钉道壁受力逐渐减小。临床资料分析可知,末次随访时双侧置钉组的椎体前缘高度比值丢失显著低于其他两组[双侧组(4.14±3.79)%,单侧组(7.95±5.85)%,未置钉组(8.89±2.54)%;P=0.022],局部后凸Cobb角增大也显著小于其他两组[双侧组(3.64±2.68)°,单侧组(6.38±3.48)°,未置钉组(4.74±1.51)°P=0.019]。结论 “盾构”作用产生的骨性隧道可增强椎体的稳定性。双侧置钉在维持椎体前缘高度及局部Cobb角方面显示出优于单侧置钉的趋势。

关键词: 胸腰椎骨折, 椎弓根螺钉, 盾构, 生物力学

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of bony tunnels created by pedicle screw implantation on the load-bearing capacity of vertebral bodies in thoracolumbar fracture surgery, and to clarify the biomechanical effects of the “tunnel shield” phenomenon in the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Methods Ten 3-month-old Bama miniature pigs were randomly divided into a unilateral screw placement group (n=5) and a bilateral screw placement group (n=5). Posterior lumbar surgery was performed, and screws with a diameter of 2.5 mm were implanted into the pedicles of L1-L5 (unilateral placement in the unilateral group, bilateral placement in the bilateral group). Spinal specimens were obtained at staged time points postoperatively. The degree of corticalization of the screw tunnel walls was quantified by CT scanning, and three-dimensional finite element models of the L2 vertebral body were established to analyze stress distribution within the screw tunnels. A hydraulic testing machine was used to compare the biomechanical strength between screwed vertebrae and normal vertebrae. A total of 83 patients with thoracolumbar fractures who underwent pedicle screw removal were enrolled and divided into three groups based on the screw placement method in the injured vertebrae: unilateral screw placement group, bilateral screw placement group, and non-screw placement group. Spinal X-ray and CT scans were performed before internal fixation removal, immediately after removal, and at the final follow-up to measure the morphology of the injured vertebrae and adjacent vertebrae, as well as screw tunnel parameters. The effects of different screw placement methods on spinal stability and screw tunnels were analyzed. Results After pedicle screw implantation into the vertebral bodies of miniature pigs, the “tunnel shield” effect led to corticalization of the screw tunnel walls. With prolonged screw retention time, the corticalization of the tunnel walls became more pronounced, and the maximum load-bearing stress of the vertebrae gradually increased, though it remained lower than that of normal vertebrae. Under the same screw tunnel diameter, as the tunnel wall thickness increased, the stress on cortical bone in both the unilateral and bilateral tunnel models gradually decreased, while the stress on cancellous bone gradually increased, and the stress on the tunnel walls gradually decreased. Clinical data analysis revealed that at the final follow-up, the loss of anterior vertebral height ratio in the bilateral screw placement group was significantly lower than those in the other two groups [bilateral group (4.14±3.79)%, unilateral group (7.95±5.85)%, non-screw group (8.89±2.54)%; P=0.022], and the increase in segmental kyphotic Cobb angle was also significantly smaller than those in the other two groups [bilateral group (3.64±2.68)°, unilateral group (6.38±3.48)°, non-screw group (4.74±1.51)° P=0.019]. Conclusion The bony tunnel created by the “tunnel shield” effect can enhance vertebral stability. Bilateral screw placement demonstrates a tendency to be superior to unilateral screw placement in maintaining anterior vertebral height and segmental Cobb angle.

Key words: thoracolumbar fractures, pedicle screw, tunnel shield, biomechanics

中图分类号: