华中科技大学学报(医学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (1): 110-115.doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1672-0741.25.08.031

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

孤独症儿童核心症状与神经免疫功能的关系:基于创造性游戏的干预研究*

王雪丽, 赵庆, 张少华, 张彦芳   

  1. 河南省南阳市第一人民医院儿一科, 南阳 473000
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-22 出版日期:2026-02-15 发布日期:2026-02-10
  • 通讯作者: E-mail:13838761806@139.com
  • 作者简介:王雪丽,女,1980年生,副主任医师,E-mail:gaike920@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    *2023年河南省医学科技攻关计划项目(No.LHGJ20230969);2024年河南省科技攻关项目(No.242102311132)

Relationship between Core Symptoms of Children with Autism and Neuroimmunity: An Intervention Study Based on Creative Games

Wang Xueli, Zhao Qing, Zhang Shaohua et al   

  1. Department of Pediatrics, Nanyang First People’s Hospital, Nanyang 473000, China
  • Received:2025-08-22 Online:2026-02-15 Published:2026-02-10
  • Contact: E-mail:13838761806@139.com

摘要: 目的 探究创造性游戏的干预对孤独症儿童核心症状及神经免疫功能的影响,并分析核心症状与神经免疫功能的关系。方法 选择2022年2月~2025年2月100例于南阳市第一人民医院就诊治疗的孤独症儿童,按随机数字表法分为观察组(进行创造性游戏干预)与对照组(进行常规康复干预),每组各50例。比较观察组与对照组核心症状指标[儿童孤独症评定量表(CARS)、孤独症治疗评估量表(ATEC)、孤独症儿童行为量表(ABC)]及神经免疫指标[白介素-17A(IL-17A)、抗髓鞘碱性蛋白抗体(anti-MBP)、白介素-6(IL-6)、骨桥蛋白(OPN)]。Pearson相关分析观察组核心症状指标与神经免疫指标的相关性。结果 干预前两组CARS评分、ATEC评分、ABC评分均无统计学差异(均P>0.05),干预后两组CARS评分、ATEC评分、ABC评分均显著低于干预前,并且干预后观察组CARS评分、ATEC评分、ABC评分显著低于对照组(均P<0.01)。干预前两组IL-17A、anti-MBP、IL-6、OPN水平无统计学差异(均P>0.05),干预后两组IL-17A、anti-MBP、IL-6、OPN显著低于干预前,并且干预后观察组IL-17A、anti-MBP、IL-6、OPN显著低于对照组(均P<0.01)。观察组IL-17A、anti-MBP、IL-6、OPN水平均与CARS评分(r=0.442、0.479、0.483、0.343)、ATEC评分(r=0.547、0.610、0.585、0.406)、ABC评分(r=0.463、0.496、0.513、0.417)呈正相关(均P<0.01)。结论 创造性游戏有助于改善孤独症儿童核心症状及神经免疫功能紊乱情况,并且较常规康复干预效果更优,孤独症儿童核心症状与神经免疫功能密切相关。

关键词: 孤独症, 儿童, 核心症状, 神经免疫, 创造性游戏

Abstract: Objective To explore the impact of creative game intervention on core symptoms and neuroimmune function in children with autism and to analyze the relationship between core symptoms and neuroimmune function. Methods A total of 100 children with autism who visited our hospital for treatment from February 2022 to February 2025 were enrolled and randomly divided into an observation group(receiving creative play intervention)and a control group(receiving conventional rehabilitation intervention),with 50 cases in each group.Core symptom indicators[Childhood Autism Rating Scale(CARS),Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist(ATEC),Autism Behavior Checklist(ABC)]and neuroimmune indicators[interleukin-17A(IL-17A),anti-myelin basic protein antibody(anti-MBP),IL-6,and osteopontin(OPN)]were compared between the two groups before and after intervention.Pearson correlation analysis was used to examine the correlations between core symptom indicators and neuroimmune indicators in the observation group. Results Before intervention,there were no statistically significant differences in CARS scores,ATEC scores,or ABC scores between the two groups(all P>0.05).After the intervention,the CARS scores,ATEC scores,and ABC scores of both groups were significantly lower than those before the intervention,and the scores of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group(all P<0.05).Before intervention,there were no statistically significant differences in the levels of IL-17A,anti-MBP,IL-6,or OPN between the two groups(all P> 0.05).After intervention,the levels of IL-17A,anti-MBP,IL-6,and OPN in both groups were significantly lower than those before intervention,and the levels in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group(all P<0.05).In the observation group,IL-17A,anti-MBP,IL-6,and OPN were positively correlated with the CARS score(r=0.442, 0.479, 0.483, 0.343, respectively), ATEC score(r=0.547, 0.610, 0.585, 0.406, respectively), and ABC score(r=0.463, 0.496, 0.513, 0.417, respectively) (all P<0.05). Conclusion Creative game intervention is beneficial for improving core symptoms and neuroimmune dysfunction in children with autism,and it is more effective than conventional rehabilitation intervention.The core symptoms in children with autism are closely related to neuroimmune function.

Key words: autism, child, core symptoms, neuroimmunology, creative games

中图分类号: